← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Oneida, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
18
detected
58
people served
25
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Nemaha

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

25
health-based violations
80
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-08-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-08-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-08-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-08-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-08-29
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-08-29

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
500 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L
11/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0085 mg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Lead
21.925 µg/L 146%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2014–2017
Arsenic
2.495 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
219.5 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
7.065 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
3.37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
6.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.905 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
7.35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.655 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.7305 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7400 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
1.395 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
21.8 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.77 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.87 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
3.6 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
230 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
32 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNitrateStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ALLEN, PATRICK
Phone
785-294-2283
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Oneida, City of

Is Oneida, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Oneida, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Oneida, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Oneida, City of serve?

Oneida, City of reports serving 58 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Oneida, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 80 violations on file for Oneida, City of, of which 25 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.