Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-07-01 → 2009-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-04-01 → 2009-06-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0059 µg/L | 1/3 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 60.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.665 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 44.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 79.55 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 92 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 64.25 µg/L 107% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 87 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 50/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 47/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 44.9 µg/L 3.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 27/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 19/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.345 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 18/50 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0054 mg/L 36% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 10.325 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 6/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
29 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Louisburg, City of
Is Louisburg, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Louisburg, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Louisburg, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Louisburg, City of serve?
Louisburg, City of reports serving 4,994 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Louisburg, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 245 violations on file for Louisburg, City of, of which 204 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.