Tap WaterIndex

← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Lindsborg, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
16
detected
3,496
people served
13
health-based violations
Kansas rankingsLead in KansasPFAS in Kansas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
McPherson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
23
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-03-25 → 1987-03-24

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1490 µg/L 115%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
2000 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.6 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
13/32 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 11/11 LCR 2023
Dibromochloromethane
1.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.1475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
0.8060 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8100 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.7350 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7500 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
4.245 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.575 µg/L 46%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
149 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dichloroacetic Acid
0.7100 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
274.5 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
9.525 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
0.7300 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
34 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WALKER, DENNY
Phone
785-227-3428
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lindsborg, City of

Is Lindsborg, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Lindsborg, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lindsborg, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lindsborg, City of serve?

Lindsborg, City of reports serving 3,496 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Lindsborg, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 23 violations on file for Lindsborg, City of, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.