← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Moundridge, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 79 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

79
contaminants tested
20
detected
1,958
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
McPherson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-02-01 → 2022-02-28
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-08-01 → 2017-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-08-01 → 2017-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1400 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2600 µg/L
86/86 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
9100 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 13000 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
806 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 870 µg/L
27/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0012 mg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2024
Lead
16.18 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
14/86 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.54 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
7/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
3.625 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
11.5 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
6/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
0.8180 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8200 µg/L
5/9 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.16 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.4 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
8.93 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.5 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
452.5 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 460 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
2.64 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
3.995 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
23.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.18 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.1551 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1600 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2014–2017
59 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JOHNSON, JEREMY
Phone
620-345-1282
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Moundridge, City of

Is Moundridge, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Moundridge, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Moundridge, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Fluoride, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Moundridge, City of serve?

Moundridge, City of reports serving 1,958 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Moundridge, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Moundridge, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.