← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Marquette, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
19
detected
596
people served
49
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
McPherson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

49
health-based violations
126
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-01-01 → 2007-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1994-01-01
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-10-01 → 1994-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-10-01 → 1994-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-10-01 → 1994-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-10-01 → 1993-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
10550 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 11000 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
218 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 260 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2017
Lead
5.67 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L
15/23 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
1.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.134 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.95 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0052 mg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Bromodichloromethane
3.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
16.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
24.75 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.395 µg/L 9%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
4.54 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
129 µg/L 6.5%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Chromium
2.76 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
402 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Selenium
9.06 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.4 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.684 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.2000 pCi/L 4%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2015
31 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WILLIAMS, ANDREA
Phone
785-546-2205
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Marquette, City of

Is Marquette, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Marquette, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Marquette, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromoform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Marquette, City of serve?

Marquette, City of reports serving 596 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Marquette, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 126 violations on file for Marquette, City of, of which 49 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.