Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 88.75 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 38/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 64.5 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.56 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 21.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 84.6935 µg/L 106% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.45 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 18.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 499.5 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L | 28/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 17/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 17/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 9.665 µg/L 64% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 12/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 48.65 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 0.9485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9800 µg/L | 8/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0062 mg/L 41% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2025 |
| Chromium | 1.885 µg/L 1.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 197.5 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.7000 pCi/L 14% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 1.1 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
43 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Pleasanton, City of
Is Pleasanton, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Pleasanton, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Pleasanton, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Pleasanton, City of serve?
Pleasanton, City of reports serving 1,238 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Pleasanton, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 297 violations on file for Pleasanton, City of, of which 253 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.