← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Pleasanton, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 62 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

62
contaminants tested
19
detected
1,238
people served
253
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Linn

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

253
health-based violations
297
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-06-01 → 2025-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
88.75 µg/L 6.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L
38/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
14.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
64.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 73 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
21.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
84.6935 µg/L 106%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
44.45 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 69 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
499.5 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 580 µg/L
28/30 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.42 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
17/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.34 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
17/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
9.665 µg/L 64%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
12/38 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
48.65 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.9485 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9800 µg/L
8/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0062 mg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2025
Chromium
1.885 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
197.5 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.7000 pCi/L 14%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
1.1 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
43 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HEGWALD, BECKY
Phone
913-352-8257
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Pleasanton, City of

Is Pleasanton, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Pleasanton, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pleasanton, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pleasanton, City of serve?

Pleasanton, City of reports serving 1,238 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Pleasanton, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 297 violations on file for Pleasanton, City of, of which 253 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.