Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2015-07-01 → 2015-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 970 µg/L 9.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 478 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 880 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0042 mg/L 28% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 11/11 | LCR | 2024 |
| Chloroform | 27 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 12.32 µg/L 82% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 5/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33.4 µg/L 56% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 17.8 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.55 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.355 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 46.55 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L | 4/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 5.145 µg/L 51% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Barium | 309.5 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 310 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Chromium | 1.29 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Fluoride | 209 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 210 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.1655 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.9000 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.6000 pCi/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
32 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Easton, City of
Is Easton, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Easton, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Easton, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Easton, City of serve?
Easton, City of reports serving 211 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Easton, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 274 violations on file for Easton, City of, of which 41 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 16 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.