← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Kingman, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 49 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

49
contaminants tested
19
detected
3,062
people served
72
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Kingman

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

72
health-based violations
100
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-03-01 → 2002-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-03-01 → 2002-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-03-01 → 2002-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-03-01 → 2002-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-04-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1996-07-01 → 1996-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
618 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 920 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Nitrate
7795 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7800 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
TTHM
11.845 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.43 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.9 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.1 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
5/33 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
0.9685 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.09 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
370 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
1.29 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
228 µg/L 5.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 230 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
1.885 µg/L 3.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.2 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.9500 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2012–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GOLDSTON, TIM
Phone
620-532-3111
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kingman, City of

Is Kingman, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Kingman, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kingman, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kingman, City of serve?

Kingman, City of reports serving 3,062 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Kingman, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 100 violations on file for Kingman, City of, of which 72 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.