Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-09-01 → 2020-11-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-02 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 15.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 86 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.94 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L | 29/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 29.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 53.2 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 19.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 27.65 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L | 28/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.78 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.4 µg/L | 25/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.075 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 22/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 433 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 490 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 9.5 µg/L 63% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 15/20 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.52 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 10/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0052 mg/L 35% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 8/8 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 10.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L | 5/29 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Edgerton, City of
Is Edgerton, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Edgerton, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Edgerton, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Edgerton, City of serve?
Edgerton, City of reports serving 1,741 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Edgerton, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for Edgerton, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.