← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Ingalls, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
19
detected
249
people served
48
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Gray

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

48
health-based violations
118
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-04-01 → 2004-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-01-01 → 2004-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3895 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3900 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
351 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L
19/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2025
Lead
34.13 µg/L 228%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
7/19 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
4.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Carbon Tetrachloride
3.0295 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L
4/10 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.94 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
9.545 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
15 µg/L 0.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1300 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
6.24 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Atrazine
0.1965 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2000 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
1.3 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
0.6000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.7 pCi/L 34%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
2.5 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumChromiumDichloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GARCIA, YESI
Phone
620-335-5118
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Ingalls, City of

Is Ingalls, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Ingalls, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ingalls, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ingalls, City of serve?

Ingalls, City of reports serving 249 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Ingalls, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 118 violations on file for Ingalls, City of, of which 48 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.