Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 28.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.57 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 41.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.17 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 95.7 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 30 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.08 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 107/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L | 85/106 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 31.5 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 55/62 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 830 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 875 µg/L | 34/34 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 16 µg/L No EPA limit set | 21/107 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 520 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 18/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0012 mg/L 8% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2023 |
| Atrazine | 0.1390 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1400 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 47.7 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Ethylbenzene | 0.2506 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2550 µg/L | 2/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Selenium | 1.86 µg/L 3.7% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lithium | 30.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Chromium | 2.3 µg/L 2.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.3000 pCi/L 6% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Lead | 2.2 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/62 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.5200 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
49 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Frusi Water Treatment Plant
Is Frusi Water Treatment Plant tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 31 contaminants in Frusi Water Treatment Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Frusi Water Treatment Plant's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Frusi Water Treatment Plant serve?
Frusi Water Treatment Plant reports serving 35,784 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Frusi Water Treatment Plant had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 58 violations on file for Frusi Water Treatment Plant, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.