← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Frusi Water Treatment Plant

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 31. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
31
detected
35,784
people served
39
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Geary

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

39
health-based violations
58
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0069 µg/L 2/2 2024
Pfhxa 0.0092 µg/L 2/2 2024
PFHXS 0.0201 µg/L 2/2 2024
PFOA 0.0211 µg/L 2/2 2024
Pfpea 0.0165 µg/L 2/2 2024
Pfpes 0.0044 µg/L 2/2 2024
PFOS 0.0088 µg/L 1/2 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
28.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
6.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
41.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 29 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
12 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
95.7 µg/L 120%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
30 µg/L 50%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
6.08 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
85/106 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
31.5 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L
55/62 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
830 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 875 µg/L
34/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
16 µg/L
No EPA limit set
21/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
520 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0012 mg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Atrazine
0.1390 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1400 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
47.7 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 48 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Ethylbenzene
0.2506 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 700 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2550 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
1.86 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lithium
30.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/2 UCMR-5 2024
Chromium
2.3 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.3000 pCi/L 6%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Lead
2.2 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/62 SYR4 2014–2017
Xylenes, Total
0.5200 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
49 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LESTER, JOHN
Phone
785-802-7018
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Frusi Water Treatment Plant

Is Frusi Water Treatment Plant tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 31 contaminants in Frusi Water Treatment Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Frusi Water Treatment Plant's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Frusi Water Treatment Plant serve?

Frusi Water Treatment Plant reports serving 35,784 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Frusi Water Treatment Plant had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 58 violations on file for Frusi Water Treatment Plant, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.