Tap WaterIndex

← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Rantoul, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
16
detected
168
people served
29
health-based violations
Kansas rankingsLead in KansasPFAS in Kansas
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Franklin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

29
health-based violations
76
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3400 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
314 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 350 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0050 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2023
Lead
2.46 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
5/13 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
65.75 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Bromodichloromethane
1.69 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chloroform
0.6595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6600 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromochloromethane
2.875 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Fluoride
169 µg/L 4.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.643 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
2.435 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
TTHM
7.07 µg/L 8.8%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.685 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
1 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
 1/2 SYR4 2015–2017
35 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
LICKTEIG, SEAN
Phone
785-878-3475
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Rantoul, City of

Is Rantoul, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Rantoul, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rantoul, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rantoul, City of serve?

Rantoul, City of reports serving 168 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Rantoul, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 76 violations on file for Rantoul, City of, of which 29 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.