← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Buffalo Hills Park

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
19
detected
135
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Ellis

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
15
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2003-07-01 → 2003-09-30
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-01-01
MON Monitoring Resolved 2018-12-01 → 2018-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
6800 µg/L 68%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6900 µg/L
56/56 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
369 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 390 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
5.23 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
18/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0065 mg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
8/8 LCR 2024
Arsenic
4.2 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
265 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 270 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
2.975 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.458 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.855 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
284 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Atrazine
0.1590 µg/L 5.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1600 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.167 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
3.073 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.2 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1.5 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
2/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
0.9700 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.5000 pCi/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
7.4 µg/L 9.3%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.3 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HOWERTON, AGNES LORRAINE
Phone
785-625-4720
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Buffalo Hills Park

Is Buffalo Hills Park tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Buffalo Hills Park's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Buffalo Hills Park's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Arsenic, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Buffalo Hills Park serve?

Buffalo Hills Park reports serving 135 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Buffalo Hills Park had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 15 violations on file for Buffalo Hills Park, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.