← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Douglas Co Rwd 6

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
14
detected
360
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Douglas

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
22
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-02
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-05-01 → 2022-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-05-01 → 2022-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-05-01 → 2022-07-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-05-01 → 2022-07-31
MR Monitoring Unaddressed 2020-12-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
56.5 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L
11/11 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
24.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
69.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 83 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.63 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
19.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
49.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 62 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
92.65 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
79 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 34 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
4.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.3 µg/L
6/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.085 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
4/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
1.6 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/11 SYR4 2014–2017

Utility contact

Contact
FUNK, LOREN
Phone
785-887-6225
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Douglas Co Rwd 6

Is Douglas Co Rwd 6 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Douglas Co Rwd 6's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Douglas Co Rwd 6's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Douglas Co Rwd 6 serve?

Douglas Co Rwd 6 reports serving 360 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Douglas Co Rwd 6 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Douglas Co Rwd 6, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.