← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Abilene, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 93 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

93
contaminants tested
21
detected
6,468
people served
91
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dickinson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

91
health-based violations
152
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-07-01 → 1998-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-04-01 → 1998-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
49/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
159.5 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.73 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L
48/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
46/48 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
19.75 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 24 µg/L
46/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
45/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
5.595 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.7 µg/L
42/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
41/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
3940 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4600 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.69 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
28/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
704 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 740 µg/L
24/35 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0011 mg/L 7.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
13/13 LCR 2023
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.045 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.1 µg/L
12/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
101.95 µg/L 5.1%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
4.775 µg/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.3 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.7440 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7700 µg/L
5/50 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
12.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/4 UCMR-5 2024
Arsenic
1.2 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
1.955 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2 µg/L
2/48 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
1.9 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.1 pCi/L 22%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
72 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BLACKETER, MICHAEL
Phone
785-263-7478
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Abilene, City of

Is Abilene, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Abilene, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Abilene, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Dibromoacetic Acid, Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Abilene, City of serve?

Abilene, City of reports serving 6,468 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Abilene, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 152 violations on file for Abilene, City of, of which 91 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.