← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Enterprise, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
20
detected
714
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Dickinson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
9
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
MON Monitoring Archived 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-10-02
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-10-02
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 1993-07-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
415 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L
22/22 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate
3500 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
13.4 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 17 µg/L
19/22 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
3.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.1 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.03 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
4.89 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0044 mg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
TTHM
13.8 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.112 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
1.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.596 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
3/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.17 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Barium
35.85 µg/L 1.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 36 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Chromium
1 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Fluoride
287.5 µg/L 7.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
11.845 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
2/7 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
6.825 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2017
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.7 pCi/L 34%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
30 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GREEP, DAMON
Phone
785-263-8521
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Enterprise, City of

Is Enterprise, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Enterprise, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Enterprise, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Enterprise, City of serve?

Enterprise, City of reports serving 714 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Enterprise, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 9 violations on file for Enterprise, City of, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.