Tap WaterIndex

← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Frontenac, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
19
detected
3,395
people served
68
health-based violations
Kansas rankingsLead in KansasPFAS in Kansas
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Crawford

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

68
health-based violations
94
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-07-01 → 2022-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-04-01 → 2022-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
77.8 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
6.6 pCi/L 132%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
 16/16 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
340 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/20 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2025
Bromodichloromethane
1.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
28.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.975 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
8.075 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.2 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
37.75 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.6 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
1.9 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 4/33 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.7505 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7700 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Barium
234 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
531 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
4.78 µg/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
1.485 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
1.29 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
0.7200 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/6 SYR4 2014–2019
Lithium
114 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 1/1 UCMR-5 2025
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
ZAFUTA, JOHN
Phone
620-231-9210
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Frontenac, City of

Is Frontenac, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Frontenac, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Frontenac, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Frontenac, City of serve?

Frontenac, City of reports serving 3,395 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Frontenac, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 94 violations on file for Frontenac, City of, of which 68 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.