Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-02-01 → 2006-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-02-01 → 2006-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-02-01 → 2006-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-02-01 → 2006-02-28 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1987-10-01 → 1990-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1900 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1232 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1700 µg/L | 13/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 7/7 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 2.84 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 4/13 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.93 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 3/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 2.37 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 71.75 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 72 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.2 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.375 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 3.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.57 pCi/L 71% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.6 pCi/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.985 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 7.395 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 339.5 µg/L 8.5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 340 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.07 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 39.55 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 20.75 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.95 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.49 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 5.2 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Aurora, City of
Is Aurora, City of tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Aurora, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Aurora, City of's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Aurora, City of serve?
Aurora, City of reports serving 53 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.
Has Aurora, City of had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 50 violations on file for Aurora, City of, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.