← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Hawks Landing

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
19
detected
51
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Clay

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
37
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-05-01 → 2010-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-11-01 → 1998-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-05-01 → 2025-05-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5990 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6200 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
39.2 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2023
Arsenic
2.175 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Barium
399.5 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Chromium
2.44 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Selenium
3.675 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Atrazine
0.1000 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.8000 pCi/L 16%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
0.7400 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
190 µg/L 4.8%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
1.2 µg/L 8%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
1/13 SYR4 2014–2017
TTHM
3.7 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.1 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.5100 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
31 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BLACKBURN, WALTER
Phone
785-447-0338
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Hawks Landing

Is Hawks Landing tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Hawks Landing's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hawks Landing's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hawks Landing serve?

Hawks Landing reports serving 51 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Hawks Landing had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 37 violations on file for Hawks Landing, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.