← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Great Bend, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 81 contaminants and detected 33. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

81
contaminants tested
33
detected
14,580
people served
31
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Barton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

31
health-based violations
75
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-09-01 → 2010-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0600 µg/L 10/20 2024
PFBS 0.0110 µg/L 6/20 2024
Pfba 0.0250 µg/L 4/20 2024
Pfhpa 0.0130 µg/L 4/20 2024
Pfhxa 0.0690 µg/L 4/20 2024
PFOS 0.0110 µg/L 4/20 2024
Pfpea 0.1100 µg/L 4/20 2024
Pfpes 0.0180 µg/L 4/20 2024
6:2 Fts 0.0100 µg/L 3/20 2024
PFOA 0.0052 µg/L 1/20 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
8900 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9800 µg/L
218/218 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
324 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 700 µg/L
117/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
8.425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
100/109 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L
99/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
99/109 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
41.2 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 65 µg/L
97/105 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
9.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L
83/109 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
7.7 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 10 µg/L
70/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.585 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
64/118 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 33 µg/L
51/109 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
50/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
40/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
51.95 µg/L 2.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 55 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
705 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 860 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
17.25 µg/L 35%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
2.8 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.7 µg/L
26/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
41.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
20/20 UCMR-5 2024
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
17/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
14.25 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L
16/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0035 mg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2024
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2 pCi/L 40%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 2.3 pCi/L
11/13 SYR4 2014–2017
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L
5/102 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.3361 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.3500 µg/L
2/18 SYR4 2014–2019
48 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneHfpo-DaMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPftaPftrdaPfunaStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DOONAN, DARREN
Phone
620-793-4170
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Great Bend, City of

Is Great Bend, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 33 contaminants in Great Bend, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Great Bend, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Bromoform, Dibromoacetic Acid, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Great Bend, City of serve?

Great Bend, City of reports serving 14,580 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Great Bend, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 75 violations on file for Great Bend, City of, of which 31 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.