← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Barton Co Rwd 2

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
17
detected
368
people served
47
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Barton

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

47
health-based violations
152
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
8900 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 9500 µg/L
36/36 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
343.5 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 410 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
13.05 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L
11/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2024
Bromoform
7.285 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
4.82 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
92.4 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 94 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.8 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
329 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 330 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
12.49 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
11.9 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
0.7375 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7400 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.6545 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.4 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
6.3 µg/L 6.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.3 pCi/L 26%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
34 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformDichloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneMercuryMonochloroacetic AcidStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SCHOENDALER, TIFFANY
Phone
620-282-0652
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Barton Co Rwd 2

Is Barton Co Rwd 2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Barton Co Rwd 2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Barton Co Rwd 2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Barton Co Rwd 2 serve?

Barton Co Rwd 2 reports serving 368 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Barton Co Rwd 2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 152 violations on file for Barton Co Rwd 2, of which 47 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.