← Kansas

Tap water quality report

Kiowa, City of

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 62 contaminants and detected 21. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

62
contaminants tested
21
detected
869
people served
1
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Barber

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

1
health-based violations
55
violations on file
18
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2026-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
678 µg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 890 µg/L
33/33 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
1358 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7400 µg/L
33/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
5925 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6500 µg/L
26/26 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
32.3 µg/L 215%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 44 µg/L
19/33 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0086 mg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2024
Bromoform
7.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
4.81 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
10.72 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.4 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.475 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
27 µg/L 34%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
8.275 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.8 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
1.9885 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
4/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
238 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Selenium
2.88 µg/L 5.8%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Arsenic
2.095 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Atrazine
1.1725 µg/L 39%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
2/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Chromium
2.7 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.7 pCi/L 34%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Trichloroacetic Acid
0.5600 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/7 SYR4 2013–2019
41 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalBhc-GammaBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
THAYER, SAM
Phone
620-825-4127
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Kiowa, City of

Is Kiowa, City of tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Kiowa, City of's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Kiowa, City of's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Fluoride, Nitrate, Lead, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Kiowa, City of serve?

Kiowa, City of reports serving 869 people in Kansas, per its EPA record.

Has Kiowa, City of had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 55 violations on file for Kiowa, City of, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 18 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.