← Indiana

Tap water quality report

Stucker Fork Water Utility

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 105 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

105
contaminants tested
15
detected
17,718
people served
168
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Scott

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

168
health-based violations
632
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-07-01 → 2016-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-04-01 → 2016-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
92.925 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
156/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
87.51 µg/L 146%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 149 µg/L
155/156 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
135.25 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 237 µg/L
30/30 SYR4 2017
Nitrate
818.5 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 830 µg/L
22/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0016 mg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2023
Lead
1.77 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L
12/30 SYR4 2017
Fluoride
1055 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
55.455 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 57.8 µg/L
8/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
165.15 µg/L 5505%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 220 µg/L
6/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.3850 µg/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.4000 µg/L
4/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
57.37 µg/L 574%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 60.3 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
0.9000 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
2/39 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
594.5 µg/L 5.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 620 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.2590 pCi/L 1.7%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2016
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
0.1000 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/35 SYR4 2012–2018
90 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAsbestosBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChloroformChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
PEACOCK, BRADLEY L
Phone
812-794-0650
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Stucker Fork Water Utility

Is Stucker Fork Water Utility tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Stucker Fork Water Utility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Stucker Fork Water Utility's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Nitrate, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Stucker Fork Water Utility serve?

Stucker Fork Water Utility reports serving 17,718 people in Indiana, per its EPA record.

Has Stucker Fork Water Utility had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 632 violations on file for Stucker Fork Water Utility, of which 168 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.