← Indiana

Tap water quality report

Naval Weapons Station, Crane

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
16
detected
6,538
people served
34
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Martin

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

34
health-based violations
91
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-06-01 → 2019-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-06-01 → 2013-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2008-08-01 → 2008-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
90 µg/L 113%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L
78/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
53.25 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 73 µg/L
76/78 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
192.4 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 277 µg/L
19/20 SYR4 2017
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
16/16 LCR 2023
Nitrate
460 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
12/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
26.915 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1026 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1040 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6.255 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
52.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.8 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
7.4 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
4/20 SYR4 2017
Antimony, Total
0.6700 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
0.6750 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
1.4 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Chromium
0.9000 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.7000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2019
Thallium, Total
0.4000 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
HUGHES, KIM
Phone
812-854-6158
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Naval Weapons Station, Crane

Is Naval Weapons Station, Crane tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Naval Weapons Station, Crane's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Naval Weapons Station, Crane's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Copper, Lead, Nitrate, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Naval Weapons Station, Crane serve?

Naval Weapons Station, Crane reports serving 6,538 people in Indiana, per its EPA record.

Has Naval Weapons Station, Crane had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 91 violations on file for Naval Weapons Station, Crane, of which 34 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.