← Indiana

Tap water quality report

Camp Atterbury

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 35 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

35
contaminants tested
5
detected
5,300
people served
8
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Federal government
Counties served
Johnson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

8
health-based violations
25
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2002-10-01 → 2002-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-07-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2000-07-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-07-01
TT Health-based Resolved 1999-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
33/33 LCR 2025
Copper
944.65 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1280 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
29.28 µg/L 195%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.8 µg/L
7/20 SYR4 2016–2019
TTHM
16.33 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 17.8 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.88 µg/L 8.1%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.9 µg/L
5/7 SYR4 2014–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
YADEN, ROD
Phone
812-526-1747
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Camp Atterbury

Is Camp Atterbury tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Camp Atterbury's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Camp Atterbury's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Camp Atterbury serve?

Camp Atterbury reports serving 5,300 people in Indiana, per its EPA record.

Has Camp Atterbury had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 25 violations on file for Camp Atterbury, of which 8 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.