← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Mount Carmel

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 23. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
23
detected
7,015
people served
30
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water under surface influence
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Wabash

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

30
health-based violations
241
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-08-01 → 2013-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-07-01 → 1995-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-07-01 → 1995-09-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0041 µg/L 2/4 2025
PFOS 0.0048 µg/L 1/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
19.82 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.4 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
57.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 77.2 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
18.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.5 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
85.6 µg/L 107%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100.6 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
39.96 µg/L 67%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 49 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
19.06 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.5 µg/L
55/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
420 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 738 µg/L
39/58 SYR4 2014–2018
Lead
0.0091 mg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Nitrate
1820 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
13/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
68.105 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.4 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1052.05 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1806 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1820 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Selenium
3.278 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.34 µg/L
5/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.7600 µg/L 7.6%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7820 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
6.321 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.36 µg/L
2/58 SYR4 2014–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.3 µg/L
2/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.11 pCi/L 42%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2015
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/57 SYR4 2012–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TURNER, RYAN D.
Phone
618-262-4822
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Mount Carmel

Is Mount Carmel tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 23 contaminants in Mount Carmel's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mount Carmel's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mount Carmel serve?

Mount Carmel reports serving 7,015 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Mount Carmel had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 241 violations on file for Mount Carmel, of which 30 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.