Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-07-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2021-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2003-02-01 → 2003-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2003-02-01 → 2003-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2003-02-01 → 2003-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2003-01-01 → 2003-01-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1500 µg/L 115% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2600 µg/L | 71/71 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lead | 3.585 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 28 µg/L | 44/71 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 10/10 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.0085 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.6 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.862 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.96 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 2.4295 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.65 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.453 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.46 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.506 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.8 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 26.48 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 26.9 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 2.453 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.46 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
4 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp
Is Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp serve?
Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp reports serving 1,635 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 12 violations on file for Pekin Fed Correctional Inst and Prsncmp, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.