Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1977-06-30 → 1981-06-29 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFOS | 0.0140 µg/L | 2/8 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 19.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.8 µg/L | 103/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 38.25 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 59.4 µg/L | 103/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 68.37 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 102.5 µg/L | 103/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 24.88 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L | 103/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 10.685 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.5 µg/L | 102/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9.3375 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 µg/L | 96/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 12.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.7 µg/L | 91/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 236 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L | 77/92 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.295 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.58 µg/L | 56/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.356 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.15 µg/L | 54/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 15.85 µg/L 106% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 42.4 µg/L | 51/92 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.376 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.55 µg/L | 33/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0120 mg/L 80% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 26/26 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 293 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/44 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 5.03 pCi/L 101% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 6.5 pCi/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 15.85 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.1 µg/L | 11/103 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 342 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 370 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 1149 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1170 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 1.244 µg/L 1.8% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L | 8/21 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 217.4 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 232 µg/L | 3/9 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| 1,2-Dichloroethane | 0.5900 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 0.5570 µg/L 5.6% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Selenium | 3.63 µg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
84 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Freeport
Is Freeport tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Freeport's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Freeport's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Freeport serve?
Freeport reports serving 23,930 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has Freeport had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 1 violation on file for Freeport, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.