Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-10-02 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2014-10-01 → 2014-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chlorite | 789 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L | 79/84 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Chloroform | 77.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 97.7 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 85.95 µg/L 107% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 115.9 µg/L | 31/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 27/27 | LCR | 2024 |
| Copper | 959.5 µg/L 74% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 19/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.92 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L | 17/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2570 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1811 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3150 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.06 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.9 µg/L | 13/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.48 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37.1 µg/L | 13/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 1.2105 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L | 12/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 62.59 µg/L 3.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 62.8 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 2321.5 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2570 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 22.935 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.4 µg/L | 8/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Arsenic | 1.467 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.47 µg/L | 7/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.93 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.5 µg/L | 7/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 3.22 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 7/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.235 µg/L 42% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 2/40 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrite | 308.55 µg/L 31% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 319 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| 2,4-D | 1.2 µg/L 1.7% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/31 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
59 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Evansville
Is Evansville tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Evansville's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Evansville's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Chloroform, TTHM, Lead, Copper, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Evansville serve?
Evansville reports serving 660 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has Evansville had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 237 violations on file for Evansville, of which 52 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.