← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Lake in the Hills

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
19
detected
28,661
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
McHenry

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
44
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-08-01 → 2012-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-08-01 → 2012-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-08-01 → 2012-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-08-01 → 2012-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-06-01 → 2005-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
1505 µg/L 116%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2080 µg/L
51/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
10.4035 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.33 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
25.762 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.76 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
38.3115 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 43.87 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
26.5 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.3 µg/L
28/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.9464 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.898 µg/L
27/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
13.01 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.9 µg/L
27/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
1380 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2180 µg/L
23/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1086 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1320 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2025
Dichloroacetic Acid
13.07 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14.4 µg/L
15/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.935 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.037 µg/L
13/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
3.0415 pCi/L 61%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.19 pCi/L
12/19 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L
12/28 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
10.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/16 UCMR-5 2025
Arsenic
1.56 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.6 µg/L
3/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
4.19 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L
3/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Cadmium
1 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
1/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
5.2 µg/L 5.2%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/23 SYR4 2012–2018
89 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitrateNitrate-NitriteNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
RIVERA, KEVIN
Phone
847-960-7520
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Lake in the Hills

Is Lake in the Hills tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Lake in the Hills's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Lake in the Hills's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Lake in the Hills serve?

Lake in the Hills reports serving 28,661 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Lake in the Hills had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 44 violations on file for Lake in the Hills, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.