← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Buncombe Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
1,030
people served
18
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jackson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

18
health-based violations
59
violations on file
1
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Archived 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
3.9087 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.35 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
56.1 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L
27/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
34.22 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.2 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 58.8 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.37 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 45.6 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
54.21 µg/L 90%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 84.3 µg/L
27/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
24.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
26/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2024
Monobromoacetic Acid
19.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.4 µg/L
7/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.99 µg/L
5/27 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
3.3 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L
4/30 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
1.62462 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.74 µg/L
3/27 SYR4 2012–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
HUGHEY, ROBERT
Phone
618-549-0432
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Buncombe Water District

Is Buncombe Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Buncombe Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Buncombe Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Copper, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Buncombe Water District serve?

Buncombe Water District reports serving 1,030 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Buncombe Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 59 violations on file for Buncombe Water District, of which 18 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.