Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 18/18 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 229 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 4.6865 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.31 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 5.9075 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.84 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 1.3755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.53 µg/L | 6/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 12.875 µg/L 86% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 6/15 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.38 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.1 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.562 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.8155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.98 µg/L | 2/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.36 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District
Is Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District serve?
Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District reports serving 863 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 2 violations on file for Wee-Ma-Tuk Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.