← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Effingham

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
20
detected
12,252
people served
13
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Effingham

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

13
health-based violations
26
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1985-06-05 → 1986-06-04
MCL Health-based Archived 1985-06-05 → 1986-06-04
MCL Health-based Archived 1985-06-05 → 1986-06-04

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
7.7125 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
132/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
65.84 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 72.3 µg/L
132/132 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
74.67 µg/L 93%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.8 µg/L
132/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
44.965 µg/L 75%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.2 µg/L
132/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.3 µg/L
131/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
10.26 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L
129/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.606 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.11 µg/L
121/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
92 µg/L 7.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L
60/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0046 mg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2025
Nitrate
670 µg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.485 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L
14/60 SYR4 2014–2017
Monobromoacetic Acid
7.757 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.03 µg/L
14/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.825 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.44 µg/L
11/132 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
18 µg/L 0.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
965.25 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.9790 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
3/23 SYR4 2012–2019
Atrazine
0.6480 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6500 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
278 µg/L 2.8%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.4800 pCi/L 9.6%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/132 SYR4 2012–2019
88 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MILLER, STEVEN W.
Phone
217-342-5303
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Effingham

Is Effingham tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Effingham's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Effingham's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Effingham serve?

Effingham reports serving 12,252 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Effingham had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 26 violations on file for Effingham, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.