Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1986-06-01 → 1987-05-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1985-06-05 → 1986-06-04 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1985-06-05 → 1986-06-04 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1985-06-05 → 1986-06-04 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 7.7125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 65.84 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 72.3 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 74.67 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 80.8 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 44.965 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 54.2 µg/L | 132/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 29.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 42.3 µg/L | 131/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 10.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.2 µg/L | 129/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 1.606 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.11 µg/L | 121/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 92 µg/L 7.1% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0046 mg/L 31% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 17/17 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 670 µg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 4.485 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.2 µg/L | 14/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 7.757 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.03 µg/L | 14/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.825 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.44 µg/L | 11/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 18 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 965.25 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1030 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Simazine | 0.9790 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 1 µg/L | 3/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Atrazine | 0.6480 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6500 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 278 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.4800 pCi/L 9.6% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/132 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Effingham
Is Effingham tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Effingham's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Effingham's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Effingham serve?
Effingham reports serving 12,252 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has Effingham had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 26 violations on file for Effingham, of which 13 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.