Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2005-10-01 → 2005-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.249 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.8085 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.62 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 9.5725 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.99 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 9.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 30.188 µg/L 38% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.8 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.384 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.11 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.212 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.01 µg/L | 27/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.69 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.14 µg/L | 25/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00093 mg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 18.175 µg/L 121% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 19.8 µg/L | 14/94 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.701 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L | 10/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 129 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.806 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.13 µg/L | 7/28 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 260.6 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 261 µg/L | 5/94 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 124.65 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 129 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2013–2016 |
| Barium | 78.77 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 84 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 1085.9 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1110 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 36.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 2.57 pCi/L 51% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about West Chicago
Is West Chicago tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in West Chicago's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in West Chicago's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does West Chicago serve?
West Chicago reports serving 25,166 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has West Chicago had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 138 violations on file for West Chicago, of which 131 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.