Is Hazel Crest Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Cook

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1992-12-21
TT	Health-based	Resolved	1992-12-21
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MCL	Health-based	Archived	1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
Other	Monitoring	Unaddressed	2025-07-01
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2004-07-01 → 2004-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Bromodichloromethane	13.1 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 14.1 µg/L	97/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Chloroform	28.96 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 41 µg/L	97/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane	6.166 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 6.36 µg/L	97/97	SYR4	2012–2019
TTHM	48.92 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L worst single sample: 61 µg/L	97/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	24.1 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L worst single sample: 102 µg/L	97/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	10.4 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 15 µg/L	97/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	13.9 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L	85/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.8 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.1 µg/L	64/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Copper	120 µg/L 9.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 330 µg/L	51/60	SYR4	2014–2017
Lead	10.1 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L worst single sample: 12 µg/L	40/60	SYR4	2014–2017
Lead	0.0053 mg/L 35% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	19/19	LCR	2026
Monobromoacetic Acid	41.645 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 78.7 µg/L	11/97	SYR4	2012–2019
Bromoform	0.5385 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 0.5409 µg/L	4/97	SYR4	2012–2019

31 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: GENTILE, ANTHONY R
Phone: 708-335-9600
Email: [email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Hazel Crest

Is Hazel Crest tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Hazel Crest's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Hazel Crest's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Hazel Crest serve?

Hazel Crest reports serving 13,792 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Hazel Crest had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for Hazel Crest, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.