Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-12-07 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-12-07 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2001-05-01 → 2001-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 1996-08-01 → 1996-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-04-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-04-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-04-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-04-01 → 1994-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1994-04-01 → 1994-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 14 µg/L | 147/147 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25 µg/L | 147/147 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.87 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L | 147/147 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 37.4 µg/L 47% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.1 µg/L | 145/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 8.28 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 145/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 12 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.4 µg/L | 144/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 5.665 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 140/144 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.7000 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.9000 µg/L | 62/147 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 343 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 540 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 7.765 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 52/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 1075 µg/L 27% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1200 µg/L | 26/26 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 24/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0080 mg/L 53% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 22/22 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 600 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 21 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 395 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 400 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 0.9000 µg/L 0.9% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.9900 pCi/L 20% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
89 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Evanston
Is Evanston tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Evanston's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Evanston's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Evanston serve?
Evanston reports serving 74,486 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.
Has Evanston had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 99 violations on file for Evanston, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.