Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-02-04 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-02-04 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-08-01 → 1992-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 172.5 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 450 µg/L | 40/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 64.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 71.65 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 77.88 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 86.26 µg/L | 32/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 25/25 | LCR | 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31.8 µg/L 53% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.7 µg/L | 21/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 6100 µg/L 61% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 20/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.294 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.67 µg/L | 17/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 4.5728 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.606 µg/L | 15/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 22.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.3 µg/L | 14/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 11.82 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.3 µg/L | 13/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.39 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 12/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 6.14 µg/L 41% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L | 12/40 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Barium | 2.75 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Fluoride | 956.2 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 968 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 6.121 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.32 µg/L | 3/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.07 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 4.1 µg/L 4.1% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.8100 pCi/L 16% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.67 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
88 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Clear Water Service Corp
Is Clear Water Service Corp tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Clear Water Service Corp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Clear Water Service Corp's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Chloroform, TTHM, Lead, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Clear Water Service Corp serve?
Clear Water Service Corp reports serving 8,900 people, per its EPA record.
Has Clear Water Service Corp had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 19 violations on file for Clear Water Service Corp, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.