← Illinois

Tap water quality report

Princeton

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 108 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

108
contaminants tested
16
detected
7,832
people served
16
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Bureau

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

16
health-based violations
20
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-12-01
TT Health-based Resolved 2019-12-01
MRDL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MRDL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MRDL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MRDL Health-based Resolved 2019-10-01 → 2019-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-10-01 → 2004-10-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
102 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1800 µg/L
57/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
29.4 µg/L 196%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 180 µg/L
37/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0270 mg/L 180%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
33/33 LCR 2025
Nitrate
190 µg/L 1.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
10.1815 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.13 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
11.515 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
10.721 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.68 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
13.975 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.5 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.434 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.47 pCi/L
7/7 SYR4 2014–2015
Arsenic
7.78 µg/L 78%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 8 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
7.42 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.8 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Fluoride
1099 µg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.5519 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.5534 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
40 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.186 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.61 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2013–2019
92 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
EGGERS JR, MICHAEL J.
Phone
815-872-0811
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Princeton

Is Princeton tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Princeton's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Princeton's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Nitrate, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Princeton serve?

Princeton reports serving 7,832 people in Illinois, per its EPA record.

Has Princeton had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for Princeton, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.