Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1980-06-16 → 1980-10-15 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2011-10-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Archived | 2011-10-01 → 2012-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1996-10-01 → 1996-10-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fluoride | 900 µg/L 23% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1000 µg/L | 97/97 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 253.7 µg/L 20% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 741 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 5.435 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 32/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0011 mg/L 7.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.63 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.9 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 23.16 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.915 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.96 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 5.338 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.38 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 8.742 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.97 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 39.02 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 39.5 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 19.18 µg/L 32% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.2 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.434 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.65 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 8.044 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.11 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 200 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 0.6645 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.6700 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 78.8 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene | 0.7700 µg/L 1.1% of the EPA limit 70 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
75 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Huxley Waterworks Dept
Is Huxley Waterworks Dept tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Huxley Waterworks Dept's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Huxley Waterworks Dept's water?
EPA monitoring detected Fluoride, Copper, Lead, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Huxley Waterworks Dept serve?
Huxley Waterworks Dept reports serving 4,244 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Huxley Waterworks Dept had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 7 violations on file for Huxley Waterworks Dept, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.