Tap WaterIndex

← Iowa

Tap water quality report

Squaw Valley South Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 49 contaminants and detected 7. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

49
contaminants tested
7
detected
105
people served
4
health-based violations
Iowa rankingsLead in IowaPFAS in Iowa
Water source
GUP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Story

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
19
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2011-06-01 → 2011-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2009-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2009-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2006-07-01 → 2009-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-01-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-01-01 → 2005-01-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0300 mg/L 200%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
 16/16 LCR 2025
Copper
942 µg/L 72%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1250 µg/L
12/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
457 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 10/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
4.7 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
3/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.58 pCi/L 32%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.6 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
430 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Fluoride
1500 µg/L 38%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
42 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateLassoMercuryPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
SQUAW VALLEY SOUTH SUB
Phone
641-483-2904
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Squaw Valley South Subdivision

Is Squaw Valley South Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 7 contaminants in Squaw Valley South Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Squaw Valley South Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Nitrate, Lead, Combined Radium (-226 And -228), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Squaw Valley South Subdivision serve?

Squaw Valley South Subdivision reports serving 105 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.

Has Squaw Valley South Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 19 violations on file for Squaw Valley South Subdivision, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.