Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-04-01 → 1997-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-04-01 → 1997-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-04-01 → 1997-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-04-01 → 1997-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1983-04-01 → 1987-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1983-04-01 → 1987-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1983-04-01 → 1987-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1983-04-01 → 1987-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1983-04-01 → 1987-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1983-04-01 → 1987-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 64.595 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15.2 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 57.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 75.8 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.243 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.86 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 16.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 76.13 µg/L 95% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 97.7 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 32.63 µg/L 54% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38.2 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.5 µg/L | 23/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.5595 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.85 µg/L | 22/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.125 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.5 µg/L | 16/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromoform | 0.7060 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.7600 µg/L | 10/23 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.3 µg/L 35% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 5/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Brooklyn Water Department
Is Brooklyn Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Brooklyn Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Brooklyn Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Brooklyn Water Department serve?
Brooklyn Water Department reports serving 1,505 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Brooklyn Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 24 violations on file for Brooklyn Water Department, of which 16 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.