Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1999-09-01 → 1999-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-08-01 → 2011-08-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 18.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 54 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 86 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 13.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 81.25 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 130 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 125/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 18.15 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 33 µg/L | 118/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.04 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 114/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 107/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 37.5 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L | 6/93 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 43 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/4 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Lead | 19.5 µg/L 130% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 2/93 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Clive Water Department
Is Clive Water Department tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Clive Water Department's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Clive Water Department's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Clive Water Department serve?
Clive Water Department reports serving 20,277 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Clive Water Department had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 18 violations on file for Clive Water Department, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.