Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2006-07-01 → 2006-08-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1991-11-01 → 1991-11-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0060 mg/L 40% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2024 |
| Copper | 44.16 µg/L 3.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 12/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 22.02 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.1335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 30.145 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 32 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.5455 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.57 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 16.23 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.2055 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 71.605 µg/L 90% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 17.615 µg/L 29% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 18 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.314 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 5.455 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L | 4/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.2315 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.47 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Keswick Water
Is Keswick Water tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Keswick Water's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Keswick Water's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Keswick Water serve?
Keswick Water reports serving 252 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Keswick Water had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 9 violations on file for Keswick Water, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.