← Iowa

Tap water quality report

Chain Ridge Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 51 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

51
contaminants tested
5
detected
25
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Johnson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
56
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2011-10-01 → 2011-10-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2008-09-01 → 2008-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-06-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2005-06-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2023
Copper
252 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 280 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
6.6 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
5/10 SYR4 2014–2017
2,4-D
0.7000 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
1/4 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
200 µg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
46 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TPAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateLassoMercuryNitratePentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
CHAIN RIDGE HOA
Phone
319-358-2257
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Chain Ridge Subdivision

Is Chain Ridge Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Chain Ridge Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Chain Ridge Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Lead, 2,4-D, Fluoride. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Chain Ridge Subdivision serve?

Chain Ridge Subdivision reports serving 25 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.

Has Chain Ridge Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 56 violations on file for Chain Ridge Subdivision, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.