Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-12-13 |
| MR | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2024-12-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2023-12-24 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 176.4 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 245 µg/L | 15/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2024 |
| Nitrate | 1200 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/22 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.442 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.62 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.327 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.44 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 15.31 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 15.7 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 2.414 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.42 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chloroform | 6.6265 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.68 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 0.8195 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8300 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.963 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.05 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lead | 5.02 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L | 2/15 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.571 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.58 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8.7345 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.76 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Bromoform | 1.05 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 2 µg/L 2% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3 pCi/L 60% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Fluoride | 200 µg/L 5% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2014 |
43 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Gavin Estates
Is Gavin Estates tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Gavin Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Gavin Estates's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Gavin Estates serve?
Gavin Estates reports serving 52 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Gavin Estates had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 175 violations on file for Gavin Estates, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 11 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.