← Iowa

Tap water quality report

Dickens Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 11. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
11
detected
151
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clay

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
12
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2001-10-01

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.00020 mg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Copper
106.28 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 170 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane
5.489 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.51 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
0.7920 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8000 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
6.565 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.6 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromochloromethane
3.769 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.8 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
TTHM
16 µg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.9920 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.5800 µg/L 3.9%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.076 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.08 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
3 contaminants tested, none detected
Monobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)

Utility contact

Contact
IOWA LAKES REGIONAL WATER (ILRW)
Phone
712-262-8847
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Dickens Water Works

Is Dickens Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 11 contaminants in Dickens Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Dickens Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Dickens Water Works serve?

Dickens Water Works reports serving 151 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.

Has Dickens Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 12 violations on file for Dickens Water Works, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.