← Iowa

Tap water quality report

Osceola Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 92 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

92
contaminants tested
22
detected
5,503
people served
49
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Clarke

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

49
health-based violations
115
violations on file
3
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-09-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-09-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-09-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-09-01 → 2024-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-03-01 → 2024-03-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-10-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-10-01 → 2020-10-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0093 µg/L 3/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chlorite
880 µg/L 88%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
181/192 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
415 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 730 µg/L
91/100 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromodichloromethane
7.93 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.7 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
35 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
43.15 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
51.3 µg/L 86%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 59 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
17.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
58/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.275 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L
46/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
5.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
38/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0060 mg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
23/23 LCR 2024
Lead
11 µg/L 73%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 13 µg/L
21/100 SYR4 2012–2018
Atrazine
0.9400 µg/L 31%
of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2012–2019
P-Dichlorobenzene
1.18 µg/L 1.6%
of the EPA limit 75 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
3/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Dibromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/58 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1300 µg/L 13%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Simazine
0.4900 µg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 4 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5000 µg/L
2/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Barium
60 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Di(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate
1 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/5 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
600 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Nitrite
470 µg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/8 SYR4 2018–2019
70 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBromoformChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHfpo-DaLassoMercuryMonobromoacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
OSCEOLA WATER WORKS
Phone
641-342-1435
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Osceola Water Works

Is Osceola Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Osceola Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Osceola Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chlorite, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Osceola Water Works serve?

Osceola Water Works reports serving 5,503 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.

Has Osceola Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 115 violations on file for Osceola Water Works, of which 49 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.