Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2020-01-01 → 2020-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1996-09-01 → 1996-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1991-03-01 → 1991-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 12 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 15 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 78.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 85 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 89.1 µg/L 111% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 20.05 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 35.2 µg/L 59% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 59/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.335 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 52/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 3600 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3800 µg/L | 52/54 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Lead | 14.5 µg/L 97% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 16/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Copper | 86 µg/L 6.6% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 15/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 4 µg/L 40% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Xylenes, Total | 0.6900 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.7000 µg/L | 3/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 120 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Dalapon | 0.6000 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Fluoride | 320 µg/L 8% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2012 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
43 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Woodward Resource Center
Is Woodward Resource Center tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Woodward Resource Center's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Woodward Resource Center's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Woodward Resource Center serve?
Woodward Resource Center reports serving 700 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Woodward Resource Center had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 41 violations on file for Woodward Resource Center, of which 23 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.