← Iowa

Tap water quality report

Waterloo Water Works

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 90 contaminants and detected 29. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

90
contaminants tested
29
detected
69,504
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Black Hawk

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
59
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-11-01 → 2015-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-02-01 → 1992-02-29
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-02-01 → 1992-02-29

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFHXS 0.0130 µg/L 4/18 2024
PFBS 0.0032 µg/L 2/18 2024
Pfpea 0.0048 µg/L 2/18 2024
Pfhxa 0.0031 µg/L 1/18 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
8467.5 µg/L 85%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 10700 µg/L
436/446 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
291.5 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 2230 µg/L
186/192 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
9.12 µg/L 61%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 688 µg/L
107/192 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1000 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1100 µg/L
39/40 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
3.745 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.64 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
5.88 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.5 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
2.755 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.82 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
12.75 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.6 µg/L
31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.665 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.71 µg/L
19/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0018 mg/L 12%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
19/19 LCR 2025
Bromoform
0.9725 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.01 µg/L
16/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.65 µg/L
13/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
2.46 µg/L 49%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.77 µg/L
11/29 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/18 UCMR-5 2024
Barium
220.2 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 227 µg/L
9/9 SYR4 2012
Selenium
3.68 µg/L 7.4%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.1 µg/L
8/9 SYR4 2012
Dichloroacetic Acid
3.2425 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.39 µg/L
6/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.81 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11.6 µg/L
5/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroethylene
2.557 µg/L 51%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.68 µg/L
4/24 SYR4 2012–2018
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
1.056 µg/L 0.5%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.11 µg/L
3/26 SYR4 2012–2018
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
0.9950 µg/L 1.4%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.03 µg/L
3/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
6.8055 µg/L 11%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.85 µg/L
2/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Antimony, Total
0.5000 µg/L 8.3%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
1/9 SYR4 2012
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
2.9 pCi/L 58%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/10 SYR4 2012–2018
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/32 SYR4 2012–2019
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaArsenicAtrazineBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHfpo-DaLassoMercuryNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, TotalO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
WATERLOO WATER WORKS
Phone
319-232-6280
Email
[email protected]

Frequently asked questions about Waterloo Water Works

Is Waterloo Water Works tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 29 contaminants in Waterloo Water Works's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Waterloo Water Works's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Fluoride, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Waterloo Water Works serve?

Waterloo Water Works reports serving 69,504 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.

Has Waterloo Water Works had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 59 violations on file for Waterloo Water Works, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.