Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2007-08-01 → 2007-08-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2023-03-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-04-01 → 2023-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 54.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 60 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 19.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 21 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 64.65 µg/L 81% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 70 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 33 µg/L 55% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 38 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.65 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16 µg/L | 128/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.9 µg/L | 127/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 200 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 570 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lead | 3.3 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L | 15/60 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Atrazine | 0.5350 µg/L 18% of the EPA limit 3 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6000 µg/L | 14/18 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 2.45 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L | 12/128 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 5.45 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 12/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 2500 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 8/30 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Fluoride | 546 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 550 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Simazine | 0.1000 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 4 µg/L | 2/13 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 50 µg/L 2.5% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2014 |
| Ethylbenzene | 4.3 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/6 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
73 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun)
Is Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun) serve?
Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun) reports serving 33,000 people in Iowa, per its EPA record.
Has Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 191 violations on file for Rathbun Regional Water Assn (Rathbun), of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.